<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Church of Dog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikepottersblog.com/2009/11/first-church-of-dog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikepottersblog.com/2009/11/first-church-of-dog/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=first-church-of-dog</link>
	<description>On life, learning, love, and laughter.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:09:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: germaine</title>
		<link>http://www.mikepottersblog.com/2009/11/first-church-of-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>germaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikepottersblog.com/?p=1197#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Ah . . . No Way Man.  That is actually pretty disturbing.  I see a prevalent problem of elevating animals above their appropriate status.  Dogs are awesome and have a very appropriate place as pets and beloved animals.  BUT, they are not to be worshiped or treated as children or people.  That is an inappropriate relationship between a person and a dog.  Stories of dog abuse get more attention and negative press than stories of children being abused.  Here on the local news station, in the same 30 minute news cast there was a story of a child who was killed by his father through abuse.  There was no warning before the story that it was disturbing,  They just read as a news story.  I am not kidding, 3 minutes later came a warning that the next story was very graphic and would be disturbing to some viewers.  The story was about a dog who had been severely abused, rescued, and was now up for adoption.  Sad, yes.  However, it is SICK that we are so desensitized or out of whack that the death of a child is less disturbing than animal abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah . . . No Way Man.  That is actually pretty disturbing.  I see a prevalent problem of elevating animals above their appropriate status.  Dogs are awesome and have a very appropriate place as pets and beloved animals.  BUT, they are not to be worshiped or treated as children or people.  That is an inappropriate relationship between a person and a dog.  Stories of dog abuse get more attention and negative press than stories of children being abused.  Here on the local news station, in the same 30 minute news cast there was a story of a child who was killed by his father through abuse.  There was no warning before the story that it was disturbing,  They just read as a news story.  I am not kidding, 3 minutes later came a warning that the next story was very graphic and would be disturbing to some viewers.  The story was about a dog who had been severely abused, rescued, and was now up for adoption.  Sad, yes.  However, it is SICK that we are so desensitized or out of whack that the death of a child is less disturbing than animal abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nu2htown</title>
		<link>http://www.mikepottersblog.com/2009/11/first-church-of-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>nu2htown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikepottersblog.com/?p=1197#comment-809</guid>
		<description>No, that is just too weird. I love my dogs, but they are animals. Yes, I do hold humans at a higher standard/priority than any and all animals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that is just too weird. I love my dogs, but they are animals. Yes, I do hold humans at a higher standard/priority than any and all animals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher D.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikepottersblog.com/2009/11/first-church-of-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikepottersblog.com/?p=1197#comment-775</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t find in the bible where animals have redeemable souls. I think it can be very dangerous if we decide how God operates based on how we feel or the love we have for our pets. Although we can have a very deep love for our pets, We have to believe that God knows best and he promises to comfort those who mourn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t find in the bible where animals have redeemable souls. I think it can be very dangerous if we decide how God operates based on how we feel or the love we have for our pets. Although we can have a very deep love for our pets, We have to believe that God knows best and he promises to comfort those who mourn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mikepottersblog.com/2009/11/first-church-of-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikepottersblog.com/?p=1197#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Preach God&#039;s word and people will respond.  I&#039;m a dog lover but they don&#039;t really need to be in church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preach God&#8217;s word and people will respond.  I&#8217;m a dog lover but they don&#8217;t really need to be in church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaila</title>
		<link>http://www.mikepottersblog.com/2009/11/first-church-of-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikepottersblog.com/?p=1197#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Maybe, but it would have to be way less cheezy.  I would go if dogs were welcome, but not the center of the service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, but it would have to be way less cheezy.  I would go if dogs were welcome, but not the center of the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.mikepottersblog.com/2009/11/first-church-of-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikepottersblog.com/?p=1197#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Nope. But then, I don&#039;t really like dogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope. But then, I don&#8217;t really like dogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

