Evidently, I just don’t get it.  When my girls text their friends while they’re talking to me; when they attempt to text their friends during dinner (which is not allowed in our home by the way); or when they invite a girlfriend over and then sit next to each other for hours in silence and text other friends, evidently that’s perfectly acceptable and normal behavior.  For me to have a problem with it is totally unreasonable and “stupid.”

According to an article in yesterday’s Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, this kind of texting is considered “multitasking” by many teens today and should not be considered offensive by the rest of us.

“I can survive without responding to texts, (but) I simply don’t see the necessity of not answering,” one young person was quoted as saying.  The article revealed that some professors and school administrators were stunned that students couldn’t understand why texting during class, or in the middle of a face-to-face conversation, would be considered disrespectful.

Another student said, “One of the most important things we want to get across to professors is that we’re not ignoring them when we’re texting.  We’re still listening. We’re still taking notes. We’re just doing something urgent.”  But not all students agree.  One young person said, “I think it’s disrespectful.  It’s distracting to other students if you hear clicking. It disrupts the whole class.”

So, what’s do you think is acceptable?  Are we “old farts” making too big of a deal out of this, or are we on to something?  When is it appropriate to text and when is it not?

Watch both of these clips and decide who you think is the bigger buffoon.  Pat or Rush?

Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson believes that at the end of each year God tells him what’s going to happen the next year, and so he goes on TV and makes his “God-ordained” predictions.  He claims that he has a good record in the percentage of his predictions that come true, but there have been some notable misses. He predicted that Russia would invade Israel in 1982, projected a worldwide economic collapse in 1985 and said Sen. Jay Rockefeller would be elected president in 1996.  In 2007 he predicted a terrorist attack, possibly involving a nuclear weapon, but it did not come about.  Oops!

This year, Robertson said that God has given him a more general warning of judgment for America’s acceptance of abortion, gay marriage and secularism. He said God will not bless a nation where abortion is commonplace, homosexuality is institutionalized and government-sanctioned prayer and Bible reading are banned in public schools.  Robertson said he did receive a clear word about the economy.  He said that the country will be ultimately bankrupt.  In light of some of his more embarrassing misses, evidently he’s decided to make less specific, more general predictions.

After reading his predictions for 2010, I decided – as a Christian leader – that I should probably make some too.  I mean, if Pat does it, so should I, right?  So, here they are.  My predictions for 2010.

2010 Prediction #1:
No matter how hard I fight it, an age-attack of biblical proportions will strike me in July of this year…as I will turn 40.

2010 Prediction #2:
My family will experience a serious financial setback in February of this year…when my daughter gets married and I have to pay for it.

2010 Prediction #3:
I will pay more taxes to the federal government than ever before this year…as I lose one of my tax-deductions (I mean “daughters”) to marriage.

2010 Prediction #4:
The Pittsburgh Steelers will not win Super Bowl 44…because – in an act of unparalleled class – they will decide to let another team enjoy the limelight this season.

2010 Prediction #5:
John and Kate won’t have any more kids.

2010 Prediction #6:
Jack Bauer will save New York City…in a mere 24 hours.

2010 Prediction #7:
Sarah Palin will make the Republicans look like even bigger buffoons..now that she’ll be seen and heard on a regular basis on Fox News. (Does anyone else cringe when she starts to talk?)

2010 Prediction #8:
Pete Rose will continue to be banned from baseball…even though cheating in baseball seems to be the norm these days.

2010 Prediction #9:
James Cameron will just keep getting richer…thanks to 10 feet tall blue aliens.

2010 Prediction #10:
Goofy Christian leaders like Pat Robertson will continue to provide us with plenty of cheesy material to laugh at…even though it’s really not that funny when goofballs like him who have a track record of being wrong continue to claim that God tells them specifics about future events. (Stones anyone?)

Feeling a bit stressed out these days?  If so, you’re not alone.

The average desk worker in America has 36 hours of work on their desk, and they spend three hours a week just sorting out the piles.  The average middle manager is interrupted 73 times a day.

On average, we spend eight months of our lives opening junk mail.  We spend one year searching for misplaced objects…when the average misplaced object has been moved only 10 inches from its original place.  More than 25 million Americans are on Prozac.  Credit card debt is at the highest level ever, with consumer debt currently standing in the trillions.

In 1850, the average person slept nine-and-a-half hours per night. Now, thanks to electricity, the figure is seven hours per night and declining.  A long-term study has recently found that people who sleep 6.5 to 8 hours per night throughout their lives live longer than those who don’t.  There are 70 million people with sleep disorders.

So, to boil it all down.  Most of us are tired, broke, and way too busy.  We’re stressed out!

I’m starting a six-week sermon series on Sunday called Stress: Dealing with the Causes and Overcoming the Symptoms. In it, I’ll address several of the main causes of stress and offer insights from the Bible on how to overcome symptoms of stress like anger, anxiety, and escape.

What was it that allowed Jesus to survive and be filled with joy in the midst of being so stressed that he sweat blood?  What was it that enabled Paul – who lived most of his adult life drowning in stress – to say that he had learned to be content in the midst of all the stress?

That’s what I want to find out, and I invite you to find out along with me.  If you live in Albuquerque, please join me for worship each Sunday morning at 9AM.  If you live outside Albuquerque, then I invite you to listen online each week at www.thefoothills.us.

In Psalm 9, David tells us that The Lord sits enthroned forever. David was sure of it, and so should we be as well.  We should remind ourselves and others of this great truth often.  The Lord is still on His throne.  The Lord is still in control.

But there is a very important implication of this truth that we must also often remember.  David says that the Lord has established His throne for justice.  Literally, the Lord has established His throne in order to decide.  He goes on to say that the Lord is a righteous judge who judges us with uprightness (literally “evenness, equity”).

Knowing that the Lord is still on his throne and is judging the world with fairness and evenness should be a source of great hope for us believers.  But, it should also cause us to pause as well.

Psalms 11:4 says that “the Lord is in his holy temple; the Lord’s throne is in heaven; his eyes see, his eyelids test, the children of man.”  The word test literally means to search out or to examine.  The Lord is sitting on His throne, and He is searching and examining us to see what and who we really are.

So, if it’s true that the Lord sits on His throne and judges (he decides as He observes the world), then a question we must all wrestle with is: What will the Lord decide about us?

A while back, I had the opportunity to talk “missional living” with Brian McLaren who is a prominent author, speaker, pastor, and networker among Christian leaders.  He told me that there’s a lot we can learn about living missionally from the Celts of old.  Here’s a portion of our conversation…

You talk a lot about the Celtic view of evangelism that says sometimes belonging must precede believing. Can you educate us a bit on this Celtic view of evangelism and why you think it’s so important for us to revisit some of their principles?

The Celtic period lasted several hundred years from about the third century on in the British Isles. The Celtic missionaries spread across Europe, and much of Europe was evangelized by the Celts.

I can make this very practical in today’s terms because my parents practiced this. When I was a teenager, my parents always made it clear that my friends were welcome in our home. I became a committed Christian as a teenager, so I started inviting my friends over. My parents were very conservative, church going people, but through our doors would come people with tattoos, long hair, and drug problems. They were welcome in our home. My parents loved them and would sit down and accept them. If I had a friend over, my parents would invite them to stay for supper.

Many of my friends came from torn families and sitting around our dinner table was as close to a taste of heaven that those kids would ever experience. My parents didn’t say, “First you have to clean up, you have to change your language and cut your hair.” They welcomed these kids into our family, believing that the love of Christ was a stronger force than the negative things in those kids’ lives. Many of those kids came to Christ and it had to do with the loving and accepting environment that my parents helped us create.

What implication does this have for parents and families?

In some ways it comes down to an issue of faith or fear. Are we so afraid of the negative influences that we withdraw? I don’t think God blesses that kind of fear, but if we have the faith that the power of God’s love is greater than these negative forces, then we’ll welcome our kids’ friends into our family. Our family will become a place with an open door and an open seat at the table, and kids will really get a taste of the love of Christ around our dinner tables.

2012?  Mayan calendar?  Nope!  “That date has not one stitch of biblical authority,” Harold Camping says from the Oakland office where he runs Family Radio, an evangelical station that reaches listeners around the world. “It’s like a fairy tale.”  The real date for the end of times, he says, is in 2011.

Camping, 88, has scrutinized the Bible for almost 70 years and says he has developed a mathematical system to interpret prophecies hidden within the Bible. One night a few years ago, Camping crunched the numbers and was stunned at what he’d found: The world will end May 21, 2011.

This is not the first time Camping has made a bold prediction about Judgment Day.  On Sept. 6, 1994, dozens of Camping’s believers gathered to await the return of Christ, an event Camping had promised for two years. Followers dressed children in their Sunday best and held Bibles open-faced toward heaven.  But the world did not end, and Camping allowed that he may have made a mathematical error.

Rick LaCasse, who attended the September 1994 service in Alameda, said that 15 years later, his faith in Camping has only strengthened.  “Evidently, he was wrong,” LaCasse allowed, “but this time it is going to happen. There was some doubt last time, but we didn’t have any proofs. This time we do.”

Would his opinion of Camping change if May 21, 2011, ended without incident?  “I can’t even think like that,” LaCasse said. “Everything is too positive right now. There’s too little time to think like that.”

Source: San Francisco Chronicle

Susan Jacoby, the author of The Age of American Unreason and a writer for the Washington Post, is celebrating the top developments in American secularism in 2009.  They are as follows:

#1: In April, the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life reported that those with no religious affiliation—the unchurched–were the fastest-growing group in the American religious landscape. More than 16 percent said they belonged to no church and identified with no religious group. Jacoby responded to this development by saying, “I consider this an extremely positive development, because those who identify with no religion—whatever their beliefs or non-beliefs about the existence of a supreme being—are least likely to support religious intrusion on government and are least vulnerable to appeals from right-wing religion.”

#2: In his inaugural address, President Obama mentioned nonbelievers as a group of Americans worthy of respect. This is the first time a president, in a major address, has gone beyond the usual litany of respect for Americans of various religious faith and included Americans who reject religion.

#3: One of the first actions of the Obama administration was to overturn the Bush administration’s policies banning research on new embryonic stem cell lines.

#4: Predictions that the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 would bring about a “return to religion” proved unfounded. Church attendance spiked briefly in the first month after 9/11, after which the drop-off in churchgoing, and the rise of the unaffiliated, has continued until today.

If you’re a Christian, then these developments ought to concern you.  But more than that, these developments ought to motivate you to live out your faith in 2010 with renewed vigor.  There is great spiritual need right where you live.  May God grant you the faith and strength to live missionally in the coming year.

Happy New Year!

I’ve been to several church conferences where I’ve heard it said again and again, “Churches need to change and evolve or else they’re going to become obsolete and culturally irrelevant.”  The struggle for us pastors is deciding what needs to change and what things from the past we should hang on to.  When I saw these church signs at a local church, it caused me to pause and wonder, “With this attitude, how long will this church last?  Can it survive the next 10 to 20 years with its outspoken commitment to ‘no contemporary services’ and ‘preaching, practicing, and promoting old time religion’?”  What do you think?

It’s the end of the year, and everyone (and their brother) is producing their list of the top movies of 2009.  I recently read Time Magazine’s 2009 Top 10 Movie List and was unimpressed.  Of their top 10, I’ve only seen two (District 9 and The Hurt Locker), and their top three movies are animated (Fantastic Mr. Fox, Up, and The Princess and the Frog).  Yuck!

So, for what it’s worth, I offer you my top 5 movies of 2009 (plus a couple other random designations).

#1 District 9
Hands-down, the best movie of the year.  So good that I wrote a blog about it after seeing it.  No need to explain.  Just read the blog!

#2 The Blind Side
I’m not much of a Sandra Bullock fan, and I hate the Baltimore Ravens, but this movie was great.  It’s the true story of Michael Oher, a homeless boy who became an All American football player and first round NFL draft pick (Ravens) with the help of a caring woman and her family.  The movie is well done, Sandra Bullock is very likable, and the story is truly inspiring.

#3 Terminator Salvation
Go ahead.  Call me shallow, but I thought this movie was good.  The critics didn’t like it very much, but I thought the storyline blended well with the first three Terminator films.  I’m a sucker for good sci-fi, and the Terminator franchise is one of my favorites.

#4 500 Days of Summer
Let me go on the record and say that I can’t stand chick-flicks, but this one was different.  It’s a well-acted romantic comedy about a woman who doesn’t believe true love exists and the young man who falls for her.  Nominated for two Golden Globes including Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy, it is the exception (not the rule) when it comes to chick flicks.  In other words, it’s good enough that a man can enjoy it and still retain his manhood!

#5 The Hurt Locker
Honestly, this was a hard spot for me to fill.  The top four were easy to name.  Number 5 was not.  The Hurt Locker is about an elite Army bomb squad unit who attempts to safely detonate bombs in Iraq.  It’s one of those movies you only want to see once because it’s so realistic and disturbing.  You don’t walk out of the theater talking about how good it was because of that, but it was really well done.

Top 2009 movie I just can’t bring myself to watch: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
The movie brought-in over $400 million at the box office this year, but I just don’t have any desire to see it.  I saw the first one and although the special effects were pretty cool, I thought the storyline and the attempt at humor were just bad enough to eclipse anything good that was in it.

Biggest Disappointment of 2009: The Soloist
A movie with a great premise: A Los Angeles journalist befriends a homeless Julliard-trained musician while looking for a new article for the paper.  A movie with really good actors: Jamie Fox and Robert Downey, Jr.  But, a movie that fell flat on its face.

Worst Movie of 2009: The Invention of Lying
So bad I wrote a blog on it.  Funny premise, but completely offensive to Christians.  If the movie would have treated Islam like it did Christianity, heads would have rolled (literally).